Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Camden Newark New Brunswick/Piscataway
Search Rutgers Finding people and more...
Links:
About us
Send us story ideas
Publication dates
Archive
Campus News:
Rutgers–Camden
Rutgers–Newark
Rutgers–New Brunswick / Piscataway
Events at Rutgers
Search Focus:
Return to RU Main Site
Rutgers Focus: Produced by University Relations for Faculty and Staff of Rutgers

Current Issue: Sep 20, 2004

Next Issue: Oct 4, 2004


New Research
E.T., drop us a line
Rethinking how extraterrestrials communicate

 

Published: Sep 20, 2004




Were E.T. really interested in getting in touch with home, he might be better off writing, not phoning. So contends Christopher Rose, professor of electrical and computing engineering at Rutgers, and Gregory Wright, physicist and private consultant, co-authors of a new analysis of interstellar communications that made national headlines as a cover article in the Sept. 2 issue of “Nature.” In their paper, Rose and Wright argue that inscribing information and physically sending it to a location in deep space is more energy-efficient than pulsing it out on radio waves that disperse as they travel.

“Our initial contact with extraterrestrial civilizations,” Rose says, “may be more likely to occur through physical artifacts – essentially messages in a bottle – than via electromagnetic communications.”

Rose and Wright hit upon their theory while trying to answer a practical question – how to cram the most information per second across a wireless channel. This led them to consider distance and the energy required to send a signal. “Think of a flashlight beam,” Rose says. “Its intensity decreases as it gets farther from its source. The unavoidable fact is that waves, both light and radio, disperse over distance, and over great distance, they disperse a lot.” Once waves pass a point, they’ve passed it for good, so a messenger must send a wave-borne message continually. Physical messages encoded in an object, however, stay where they land.

Rose is in favor of listening for messages, but he thinks researchers should look for them as well. Messages may already have landed; we might literally be standing on them, Rose says. Messages might not arrive as language, per se: They might include anything from text to organic material embedded in an asteroid or crater. Rose concedes that the idea may be hard to accept, but, he says, the difficulty arises from our concern about time. If the sender doesn’t care about its greeting reaching his intended target and getting a reply in its own lifetime, the difficulty disappears.

– Ken Branson

Return to the Sep 20, 2004 issue


For questions or comments about this site, contact Carla Cantor
Last Updated: Sep 20, 2004

2004 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. All rights reserved.